Discussion about this post

User's avatar
refusenick's avatar

thank you, Julius. as a (former) constitutional lawyer here in the US, this is exactly what I have been trying to explain to people since this fiasco began. "rights" are not "rights" if they can be dishonored by the government. there can be intelligent debate about where exactly the line exists between your rights and my rights, if they conflict, but the burden of persuasion in that case MUST always fall on the party wishing to impinge on those rights and NOT on the party whose rights are being impinged upon.

Expand full comment
Terry Taylor's avatar

Making power real! Thanks for your expositions.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts