Mr. Ruechel, thanks very much for condensing your investigative report here. It's much more effective to spread the word about my own thoughts on Covid and its experimental vaccine.
One important point is you appear to believe PCR is a valid covid test.
FYI: there is a team of Canadian doctors who thinks otherwise, per this link:
Hi Tom, thanks for the links! I fully agree with your concerns about the PCR test; I feel the same way. It seems to produce a huge number of false positives, the high cycle threshold produces meaningless results, and the PCR test is not an appropriate way to assign cause of death. The PCR test was not designed to be used as a diagnostic tool; it was designed as a diagnostic aid, to be followed up via laboratory testing, and only for testing symptomatic cases, not for population-wide testing of asymptomatic people.
All those issues with PCR testing make the story for the government even worse. However, they are unfortunately all issues were there is a lot of debate, so I focused on simply using publicly available data for my report - the government's own official data - to tell the story since they can't really deny these numbers since they are their own numbers. And even then, without addressing the misuse of the test or all the false positives, the evidence is damning. The year-over-year mortality data, for example, provides an indication of just how useless the PCR test has been at assigning cause of death.
Mr. Ruechel, thanks very much for condensing your investigative report here. It's much more effective to spread the word about my own thoughts on Covid and its experimental vaccine.
One important point is you appear to believe PCR is a valid covid test.
FYI: there is a team of Canadian doctors who thinks otherwise, per this link:
https://standupcanada.solutions/canadian-doctors-speak
For more evidence about the efficacy of PCR covid tests:
https://www.covidtruths.co.uk/2020/12/dr-reiner-fuellmich-is-attacking-the-pcr-test-fraud/
And this is his latest update:
https://www.covidtruths.co.uk/2021/03/dr-reiner-fuellmich-pcr-lawsuit-update-march-2021/
Hi Tom, thanks for the links! I fully agree with your concerns about the PCR test; I feel the same way. It seems to produce a huge number of false positives, the high cycle threshold produces meaningless results, and the PCR test is not an appropriate way to assign cause of death. The PCR test was not designed to be used as a diagnostic tool; it was designed as a diagnostic aid, to be followed up via laboratory testing, and only for testing symptomatic cases, not for population-wide testing of asymptomatic people.
All those issues with PCR testing make the story for the government even worse. However, they are unfortunately all issues were there is a lot of debate, so I focused on simply using publicly available data for my report - the government's own official data - to tell the story since they can't really deny these numbers since they are their own numbers. And even then, without addressing the misuse of the test or all the false positives, the evidence is damning. The year-over-year mortality data, for example, provides an indication of just how useless the PCR test has been at assigning cause of death.